On Tuesday, 26 May 2015, at 11:22 am, Danny Thorpe wrote: > What prevents RBF from being used for fraudulent payment reversals? > > Pay 1BTC to Alice for hard goods, then after you receive the goods > broadcast a double spend of that transaction to pay Alice nothing? Your > only cost is the higher network fee of the 2nd tx.
The "First-Seen-Safe" replace-by-fee presently being discussed on this list disallows fraudulent payment reversals, as it disallows a replacing transaction that pays less to any output script than the replaced transaction paid. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
