Mark Friedenbach <m...@friedenbach.org> writes: > Rusty, this doesn't play well with SIGHASH_SINGLE which is used in > assurance contracts among other things. Sometimes the ordering is set by > the signing logic itself...
Ah, I forgot about that particular wart. Yech. Implies that you can order inputs or outputs, not both. Something like "outputs must be in order, inputs which do not CHECK(MULTI)SIG_(VERIFY) a SIGHASH_SINGLE sig must be in order with respect to each other". But that's much less trivial since it implies script evaluation. In other news, I noticed Kristov Atlas's concurrent proposal just after I posted this (via reddit). He used far more words, but didn't note this issue either AFAICT. Thanks! Rusty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
