On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 05:23:48PM +0200, Pieter Wuille wrote: > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Luke Dashjr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > > > I also agree with Pieter, that this should *not* be so cleanly compatible > > with Bitcoin transactions. If you wish to share code, perhaps using an > > invalid opcode rather than OP_RETURN would be appropriate. > > > Using an invalid opcode would merely send funds into the void. It wouldn't > invalidate the transaction.
Just set nLockTime to 500000000-1 and nSequence appropriately to make the transaction impossible to mine for the next 9500 years. Though I agree that this whole idea seems a bit dubious to me. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000000dd919214b66444dcebb4aa0214c1ab7c8b3b633be71f
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
