On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: >> And allegations that the project is "run like wikipedia" or "an edit war" >> are verifyably untrue. >> Check the commit history. > > This was a reference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin > were to do a pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he > would revert it. And I fully believe he would do so!
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/37pv74/gavin_andresen_moves_ahead_with_push_for_bigger/croxw9o?context=1 This is the only reddit comment I've made using the word revert in recent memory, so I know you couldn't be referring to another. >> I was recently in a situation similar to what Gavin is in insofar as a >> design dispute that could improperly solved by a git push. I'm pretty >> impressed he hasn't given in and done a midnight push. It's cool to see him >> back channeling support. > Such a change would be immediately reverted. And, I probably should have continued "and resulted with an immediate revocation of commit rights on the assumption that his account had been compromised." There is nothing controversial about that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
