El Domingo, 17 de Abril de 2005 01:52, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > You are suggesting dropping the <command>. Is that something that has > to be done for all or can we just do that as time allows?
Dropping the <command> and adding <literal> in files creation command. > Again, this looks like a huge task. I do not doubt that it should be > done, but BLFS 6.0 was released with an incomplete index just because of > the time it takes to go back and do that to 360 packages. Is there a > transition strategy we can use? The transition strategy is easy: a person with many free time dedicated exclusivelly to do a full XML revision of the book, I. When the policies wiil be decided and accepted, I first will update template.xml, to add some small XSL/CSS changes (if required) to have a similar output with the old and new tagging, and then I will start that revison page by page alphabetically. If all go well, in four/five weeks the work could be done. > Hmm. LFS also starts with lowercase in some cases (less). I'm not sure > what the best way is for us. Originally, it was a sentence-like > structure. The table type rendering does seem appropriate. Thanks to point the typo, fixed now ;-) > Are you gonig to render these specially? If so how. Like are rendered in LFS, in italic. See chapter04/addinguser.html as example. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
