Tobias Gasser wrote: > Armin K. schrieb: > >> Well, those are snapshots, and are always named after the current day, >> ie for today, package name is foomatic-db-4.0-20120803.tar.gz. There are >> also two files, foomatic-db-4.0-current.tar.gz and >> foomatic-db-current.tar.gz, which are possibly symlinks to >> date-versioned one. I guess we could use -current, but ... If some >> change occours, we might not be prepared. That's why I asked to have >> some snapshot on the servers and write and/or correct instructions for >> that one only. > > i'd vote for using the original -current. > > as these packages are just printer definitions, there is a very low > probability to have any issues with an update.
A note about -current may be reasonable, but we need to have a constant file with a fixed md5sum as the main reference. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
