On 01/16/2014 05:08 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 15-01-2014 01:18, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >> Em 15-01-2014 00:47, Armin K. escreveu: >> >>> This was rather valid. Recommended dependencies are the ones that need a >>> switch to disable and shouldn't be disabled explicitly unless the >>> dependency isn't present in BLFS. >>> >>> As a side note, midori no longer requires libunique in any way. >> >> Yes, Thanks. >> >> Why those two info were missing in the ticket that you created and I >> accepted, only narcissus knows. >> >> Meanwhile, libunique stays there... >> > > Fixed at Revision: 12591. Still, I would have been most thankful if you > had included the info in TÃquete #4560. >
I didn't pay attention to optional dependencies. I saw the dependency in the commit mail. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
