Em 20-01-2014 14:07, Randy McMurchy escreveu: > On 1/20/2014 10:53 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >> Is it correct to say that LWP::Protocol::https is a dependency of LWP? > > Not really, but kind of. Sort of a runtime dependency because if you want > HTTPS support, you must install the HTTPS stuff after LWP is installed.
I was thinking more as optional or recommended, but not as runtime, thanks. And a strange one (circular): LWP::Protocol::https is runtime dependency for LWP, but LWP is required dependency for LWP::Protocol::https :-) In other words, if you want LWP with HTTPS support, install LWP::Protocol::https using cpan -i, and everything will be there. >> Or is it correct to say that LWP is a dependency of LWP::Protocol::https? > > Yes. Go ahead and change it so that it is clear to you. However, HTTPS > support is not mandatory for an LWP installation. If you read the README > (or whatever text file is supplied) in the LWP package, this is explained. > Perhaps you could read that and then rephrase the book to clarify things > for you. That part, I'd already understood form the text in BLFS. For this part it was clear enough. Thank you very much, Randy. "Fixed" at revision 12611. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
