On 03/14/2014 12:42 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 14-03-2014 04:28, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >> Olaf wrote: >>> On 2014-03-12 04:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>>> If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell >>>> me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent >>>> released version of the package. >>> >>> I recently stumbled over nano, BLFS has 2.3.2 which is actually a devel >>> release. 2.2.6 is the latest stable. >>> >>> Release scheme seems to be even=stable, odd=devel >>> Version should be retrievable from here http://www.nano-editor.org/ >>> With a release history (for reference) here >>> http://www.nano-editor.org/overview.php >> >> Ok thanks. I was just taking the max value at >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nano/, but I can change that to the last even >> numbered minor version. >> >> Fixed. > > Armin updated to 2.3.1 and I did it to 2.3.2, I think (cannot fine > changelog, though). Should it be reverted to 2.2 series? > >
At that time I didn't know that it was development version. But I never saw any problems and it does seem to have more features than the one on archlinux, which is 2.2.x. Last stable release was quite a while ago and I don't think it really hurts having the latest release of the editor. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
