For years, I have avoided gcc 4 because it sounds like it's more trouble than it's worth. Many lfs/blfs instructions involve applying a patch to the source that will resolve gcc 4 issues, and that suggests to me that (some? most?) Linux source was still designed with gcc 3 in mind.
Now I'm about to plunge into xorg 7.0, and I only want to do this once. Is there any particular advantage to using gcc 4, or am I better of staying with gcc 3? I'm currently on kernel 2.6.15, gcc 3.4.4, glibc 2.3.5. -- Peter B. Steiger Cheyenne, WY -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
