On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:13:24 +0100 Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > a écrit : > >> For the future, keeping notes of what works and what changed is >> always a good idea. Unfortunately, I still have trouble achieving >> this! It may help to put your scripts into just a few scripts which >> serve identifialble purposes. I have my own scripts for xorg, basics >> (toolkits, windowmanager, firefox and other "essentials"), extras >> (cups, gimp, etc), audio-video, gnome-stuff. When I upgrade (not >> very often) I try to preserve the old versions of my scripts and add >> the changes into the current versions. > > I usually take great care of what I do on my computer, with a little > script. But I thought gtk+ was a piece of cake... > > Now I understand why you BLFS guys don't follow the progresses of the > Gtk/Gnome team : these are no progress ! It's absolutely impossible to > follow the successive versions and their dependencies :-( For example, > even the README of the gtk+ packages don't mention a version of pango or > atk. But this seems to be very important ! I had to use a dev version of > pango to install the latest stable version of gtk+ ???
The whole GTK+ stack follows the GNOME release schedule. So, you can go off of what versions were part of the GNOME release you're following. http://download.gnome.org/platform/ http://download.gnome.org/desktop/ http://download.gnome.org/bindings/ http://download.gnome.org/admin/ http://download.gnome.org/devtools/ You should be able to find all the packages there sorted by GNOME release. This is how Randy sorts out the versions that go into BLFS. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
