Thanks Chris, they're all blue now.

Op woensdag 21 februari 2024 om 18:09:55 UTC+1 schreef chri...@google.com:

> Hi,
>
> Please start the reviews for the 5 other areas shown below in your 
> chromestatus entry (once you've done show they should turn blue, not gray):
>
> [image: Screenshot 2024-02-21 9.08.57 AM.png]
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 8:03 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
> yoav...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1
>>
>> Thanks for catching us up here!!
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:57 PM Mattias Buelens <mattias...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emails
>>>
>>> mattias...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/streams/blob/main/readable-stream-async-iteration-explainer.md
>>>
>>> Specification
>>>
>>> https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#rs-asynciterator
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> The streams APIs provide ubiquitous, interoperable primitives for 
>>> creating, composing, and consuming streams of data. This change adds 
>>> support for the async iterable protocol to the ReadableStream API, enabling 
>>> readable streams to be used as the source of for await...of loops.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink component
>>>
>>> Blink>Network>StreamsAPI 
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ENetwork%3EStreamsAPI>
>>>
>>> Motivation
>>>
>>> To consume a ReadableStream, developers currently acquire a reader and 
>>> repeatedly call read(). By adding support for the async iterable protocol, 
>>> web developers will be able to use the much simpler for await...of syntax 
>>> to loop over all chunks of a ReadableStream.
>>>
>>> Web developers are already using polyfills to async-iterate over a 
>>> ReadableStream. These polyfills usually work fine, but might not handle all 
>>> edge cases correctly (such as when the stream errors during a read, or 
>>> releasing the reader's lock when breaking out of a for await...of loop).
>>>
>>>
>>> Initial public proposal
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> Search tags
>>>
>>> streams <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:streams>
>>>
>>> TAG review
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> TAG review status
>>>
>>> Not applicable. (This is a small feature with a mature specification 
>>> that's already shipping in Firefox.)
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> Low risk. The Streams API has already been standardised for a long time. 
>>> Async iteration is already supported in one other browser (Firefox) and 
>>> several JavaScript runtimes (Node.js, Deno, bun).
>>>
>>>
>>> Gecko: Shipped/Shipping (
>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1525852) Shipped in 
>>> Firefox 110
>>>
>>> WebKit: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/319)
>>>
>>> Web developers: Positive (https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/778) 
>>> Developers already expect this to work, and often use a polyfill.
>>>
>>> Other signals:
>>>
>>> Activation
>>>
>>> Async iteration can be feature detected by checking the existence of 
>>> `ReadableStream.prototype.values`. Various polyfills already exist in the 
>>> wild. (e.g. 
>>> https://jakearchibald.com/2017/async-iterators-and-generators/)
>>>
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> No special support needed. The JavaScript debugger is already 
>>> sufficiently capable of handling for await...of loops.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/streams/readable-streams/async-iterator.any.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Flag name on chrome://flags
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> Finch feature name
>>>
>>> ReadableStreamAsyncIterable
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>
>>> False
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>>
>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40612900
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>>
>>> No milestones specified
>>>
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5143121161879552
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b1438dfd-ec71-4e18-b34d-0213aff6250cn%40chromium.org
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b1438dfd-ec71-4e18-b34d-0213aff6250cn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohS%2B%3DFoQs%3DtGNQWLaeqjbrJmjB-C_A%3D%2BY6Grwps%2Bik92xoA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohS%2B%3DFoQs%3DtGNQWLaeqjbrJmjB-C_A%3D%2BY6Grwps%2Bik92xoA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9660508f-9ac9-43b4-a1b6-57e45f39afaan%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to