On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is no indication in the babel-1.6 source tree that I could find > to indicate that it is not FOSS.
If you take a look at any source file: > This file is part of the Babel Program > Copyright (C) 1992-96 W. Patrick Walters and Matthew T. Stahl > All Rights Reserved To me, that pretty much rules out open source. > It looks like openbabel-2.1.1 is in the package tree, and it would > be worth checking out I take it. In I'd certainly suggest Open Babel 2.2.0. Trust me, it has a lot of fixes over 2.1.1. :-) Cheers, -Geoff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
