+1 also on Emiliano's comment. Paolo
On 05/02/2021 14:26, Emiliano Vavassori wrote: > Il 02/02/21 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have >> misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take >> is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support. >> >> "rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time >> being deny all write >> operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll >> freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for >> free, and if/when we decide to accept contributions again everything >> will be just one switch away." > +1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them: > > * branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before) > 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by > Collabora) > * OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit > * revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on > git/gerrit on TDF infra. > > After this bits, I think this whole votes needs another round of > confirmation - to be sure that also these bits are consensual. > > Cheers, -- Paolo Vecchi - Deputy Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
