In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:43:31 -0500 David Abrahams
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Does anybody else feel they need more time to give this library a
> thorough going-over?
If no more time is available, I'd have to vote against including the
library in its current form. I've posted my concerns in other messages,
but to summarise:
(1) The 1-step construction issue. In other words, whether:
const MyClass object(ar);
can be supported.
(2) Whether the archive handles reference counts correctly.
(3) That variable length integers be supported.
(4) That the limits on version numbers etc are too small.
-- Dave Harris
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
