Thomas Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My idea of the further schedule is
>
> - Check whether we all agree that this is the version to work from.
I'm on board.
> - Check in to sandbox
> - See whether the interface can be made to work on a reasonable set
> of compilers.
The SC version was working on a _wide_ set of compilers. Fixing that
once you check in your changes should be a priority.
> - Documentation
> - Port existing iterator_adaptors.
Sounds good.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
