"William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > That's a good idea. So would users prefer new exception types here,
>> > or should I use the std:: exceptions?
>>
>> IMO, it's always safer to use an exception type which provides
>> more-specific information.
>
> What extra information do you want provided?
For example, that it was a threading library exception. Information
carried by the type identity may be enough.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
