"Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I'm seriously considering putting in a default constructor
> since their don't really see serious downsides...
One thing to consider would be to use the new optional<> library to
handle these out-of-bounds cases. It doesn't sound like it's a
superior solution to me, but possibly worth considering.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
