"Gabriel Dos Reis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > More accurately, there are *two* notions being considered: > > 1) typedef template; > 2) template aliasing -- the thingy Andrei is missing.
Could you clue us in on the current consensus? You would still express 2) using template typedefs, right? Is it possible or likely that the proposal will be altered to be more inclusive? Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
