On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:38 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
> Ah, that's the reason. But given my recent discomfort about
> unmaintainable code, look at it again:
>
> # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__HP_aCC, <= 33900)
> template<bool cond, typename T> struct enable_if;
> # else
> template<bool, typename T> struct enable_if;
> # endif
>
> Does this really makes sense? Shouldn't we just keep one version with
> names for template parameters? AFAICS this should work for all compilers
> and it could be a general boost coding guideline to always provide names
> for template parameters. Comments?
FWIW, I didn't apply the patch directly but instead changed it to what you
ask:
template<bool cond, typename T> struct enable_if;
I'd be fine with making this a coding guideline...
Doug
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
