Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
> > See also the discussion about a "general coding guideline" to "always
> > provide a name for template parameters". Here, the maintainer already
> > did the right thing when he received the patch.
>
> If the maintainer hid the compiler brokenness completely, then they did
> the wrong thing. If they didn't, they used an #ifdef (via
> BOOST_WORKAROUND).
So you would prefer
#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__HP_aCC, <= 33900)
template<bool cond, typename T> struct enable_if;
#elif BOOST_WORKAROUND(__VisualAge, <= 12345) // Dummy values
template<bool, typename T> struct enable_if;
#else
template<bool, typename> struct enable_if;
#endif
over
template<bool cond, typename T> struct enable_if;
If that is the case, then we disagree. Do you have any reason to prefer
the first version?
Regards, Daniel
--
Daniel Frey
aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology
Schlo�-Rahe-Stra�e 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany
fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], web: http://www.aixigo.de
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
