From: "Daniel Frey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 19:01:08 +0100, Peter Dimov wrote: > > > Daniel Frey wrote: > >> typedef test::remove_pointer< int A::* >::type t1; typedef > >> test::remove_pointer< int A::* const >::type t2; typedef > >> test::remove_pointer< int A::* volatile >::type t3; typedef > >> test::remove_pointer< int A::* const volatile >::type t4; > >> > >> typedef test::add_const< int( int ) >::type t5; typedef > >> test::add_volatile< int( int ) >::type t6; typedef test::add_cv< > >> int( int ) >::type t7; > > > > Why do you expect these to work? > > Because add_const< int& > returns int&. I was under the impression that > a) type-traits should compile if possible and b) that in the case of > add_const the input type is returned unmodified if it cannot exist as a > const version.
I wasn't sure what you expected from add_const< int (int) >; you might have wanted "int (int) const" as a result. Anyway, add_const(T) returns "T const", whatever that means. References shrug off cv-qualifiers. Function types generate errors. They'll start shrugging off cv-qualifiers once compilers implement CWG#295. I don't see why you expect remove_pointer(T) to work when T is not a pointer. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
