"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You said "optional<T>" above.
"Do what I mean, not what I say" ;-)
> It may be possible to use optional<T&> (is it supported?) or optional<
> reference_wrapper<T> > but this looks like an "obfuscated C++" entry to me
> compared to T*.
Good point.
> What's wrong with it? What does optional<T&> add?
Suppose you have a
variant<mpl::list<int&, std::string&> >
How do you check to see if it contains an int&?
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
