"Ken Hagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message b32951$hn8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b32951$hn8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Reading various replies, we appear to have a couple of things that > aren't completely pinned down: the type of "&k" and the implementation > of TLS. rest snipped...
You have pointed out what I have said right from the beginning. Depending on the implementation, &k can be different things, and therefore the TLS problem is essentially implementation-defined. Of course I still am gladly following the discussion which assumes that &k is most likely something which one might expect it to be most of the time, a pointer into a table of values for each thread, and that one can expect to decide intelligently from that whether or not one can use it as a value in a template instantiation for a non-type template parameter, but essentially we can not know this until we know how a given compiler's implementation treats it. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
