"Sam Partington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think I agree, we want to provide as little restrictions as possible. > > Also seems to me that anyone who declares a global template operator! > deserves some problems!
I don't know why you think so. > So, now with David's suggestion, I've attached what I propose. > > I've tested to a small extent on MSVC6 and gcc 2.95, which are all the > compilers I have access to now. > > (First time I've used a patch file so apologies if I've messed it up) It's very nice, but you left out the most-important parts: patches for the docs and testsuite. > Sam > > PS Did anyone who uses OE-Quote notice what a mess it made of the wrapping, > interpreting > B>:: as three seperate reply inserts? and so miss out the B, and substitute >> > >. ;-) Great program 99% of the time though. Yep. I went back to emacs, though. It's still better overall for my needs. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost