I was just getting ready to propose a new config macro called
BOOST_ARG_DEPENDENT_TYPENAME based on this test:
struct id { typedef int type; };
template <class T> struct foo;
template <class T>
void f(T)
{
typedef foo<typename T::type> y;
}
int main()
{
f(id());
return 0;
}
But it turns out that this test is very similar to the one for
BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME, and in fact it finds the same compiler (VC6).
So I guess the question is, do we currently have the right name for
the test and macro? VC6 will support typename on template arguments
in some contexts:
struct id { typedef int type; };
template <class T>
void f(T)
{
typedef typename T::type x;
}
int main()
{
f(id());
return 0;
}
But then, it also works if you leave the typename off altogether.
Not sure what to do about this one,
Dave
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost