Andrei Alexandrescu
Wed, 03 Sep 2003 16:36:28 -0700
"Hurd, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > I use optional<T> quite a bit and am glad T and optional<T> are different. > Saves my bacon when I do silly things, especially when something transitions > from a T to an optional<T>. Strongly typed maintenance is something I'm > thankful for. > > T* and optional<T> substitutability seems fine to me. By the way, could optional<T> use variant<T, SomeInsipidType> as a backend? Andrei _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost