"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." wrote: > > I'm baffled that they want to penalize (time and space) those for whom a > naked semaphore works. It's blatantly clear to anyone who's had to write a > mutex that it's additional code on TOP of a semaphore.
Optimization stratergies aside (they are different for mutexes and semas) a binary semaphore can be used as "normal" POSIX mutex. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
