David Abrahams wrote: [...] > > bool expected_exception<T>(); > > ...." > > > > He hasn't yet replied... well, perhaps YOU could shed some light? ;-) > > I don't know; I haven't been probing people about changes we could > make to the EH specification, and I doubt I could do it effectively > because I don't understand the issues at a deep level. The way the > committee works is that those who care (meaning you) have to > participate, or nothing changes. > > I can say that I _sense_ no general desire to change anything > significant about EH, but that may just be because nobody knows > there's an important issue. With that, I'll repeat: please take this > non-Boost-related part of your discussion off-list.
Okay. But fix the "http://www.boost.org/more/error_handling.html";, please. FYI, <Forward-Inline> -------- Original Message -------- Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:49:32 +0200 Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: std0X::expected_exception<T>() ".... template<class T> bool expected_exception() throw(); Returns: true if matching handler is found. Notes: if expected_exception<T>() returns false then throwing T (at the point of expected_exception<T>() invocation) will result in the invocation of unexpected() handler with an exception consider caught. In effect, (in this new edition of this International Standard:-) if (!std::expected_exception<T>()) { throw T(/*...*/); } is equivalent to: if (!std::expected_exception<T>()) { try { throw T(/*...*/); } catch(const T&) { std::unexpected(); } } ...." Would you vote against it? Why? TIA. Well, "the context" is this: http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg48162.php http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg48211.php ([boost] Re: Exception handling... it's time to fix the http://www.boost.org/more/error_handling.html) regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
