> Julia Thompson wrote: > > > >> I think that is a badder thing to do than (...) > > > > Speaking of which, you missed one such exception. Shouldn't it be > > "worse", not "badder"? :) > >
Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > No, it should be "ungooder" > No, it should be "plus ungood", or "double plus ungood" if more emphasis is required. -- Matt _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
