In a message dated 9/22/2003 9:52:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

> 
> 
> The Fool quoted:
> >
> > I never called the movie anti-Semitic (...)
> >
> Which is stupid, because the Gospels _are_ anti-Semitic, and
> a movie that pretends to be faithful to them [AFAIK, if Gibson
> wants to do it in Aramaic, he has this intention] should be
> anti-Semitic.It's like making a movie about Charlemagne's
> Cavaliers: it must be anti-islamic. 
> 
> [OTOH, Gibson _has_ slaughtered History in his two
> anti-British pieces, the Scottish and the USA independent 
> movies,
> so maybe he can ignore the Gospels and make a movie
> that shows the Jews in a much more favourable way than
> the Gospels did]
> 
> Gibson has apparently based his gospel on the work of an 18th century nun noted for 
> her antisemitic writings. The draft seen by some individuals is said (by a religion 
> professor who is a catholic nun) to be very anti-semitic. Gibson showed the movie to 
> several highly conservative religous/political leaders in washington dc a while ago 
> and refused to allow anyone remotely part of the mainstream (let alone liberal) 
> press see it. He has attacked those who have questioned his motives (like Frank 
> Rich). He began these attacks (against Jews liberals etc) on O'Reily last January 
> before anyone had commented on the movie. O'Reily by the way has a deal with 
> Gibsons's production company so you can imagine how aggressively he questioned 
> Gibson. Gibson's father has at various times been a holocaust denier (in some 
> writings he uses holocaust in quotes and he has said that the Germans simply wanted 
> to encourage jews to migrate to Jeruselum to stabalize the political situation in 
> the Middle East. 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to