Jim Sharkey wrote:
>
> That's an interesting idea, and one I hadn't considered!  However, as
> they might say at Terragens training schools, you can't really take 
> human experience and overlay it onto Galactic experience.  The
> extrapolation of "generations" makes some logical sense, but the 
> core idea that you *can* extrapolate from human history to Galactic 
> history may be flawed.
> 
Ok, but at least it gives some "magnitudes" about what we
are talking about. And we hit the 150 My ago critical date,
when something nasty happened :-)

> Also, from strictly a "this is an awe-filled universe" point of view,
>  I *like* the idea of races such as the Tothtoon and Krallnith still 
> being out there adn having a legacy that stretches over half-a-
> billion years.  It gives the Four Galaxies a broader and (while I 
> know the Good Doctor would hate the expression) more romantic scope.
> 
Maybe it's ok to have _one_ ancient race, but the problem is
_too many_ ancient races. Worse: these races have just one client,
and this client was uplifted some 500 My after the 1st race. This
does not make much sense.

> I imagine 
> that's just another reason why some Galactics hate Earthclan; here 
> are these obnoxious wolflings who got to become treated like nid-
> level patrons because they've got two client races.
> 
Yes - Earthclan got prestige without power.

>> I am not the Evil Overlord, I just command one Legion of Terror :-)
> 
> Yes, but that has to have some rewards?  You know, pillaging 
> peasants, impressing pneumatic young women, that kind of thing, right?
> 
Yes :-)

Alberto Monteiro

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to