At 09:00 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:37 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Dave Land wrote:
Gadzooks, you hit a nerve.
Now, I have to stop writing this email and get some work done for a
12:00 meeting.
I hope it is not significant in that context that the time stamp on
this message from you reads "1:37 PM" . . .
I'm Late!! I'm Late!! Maru
The timestamp I was seeing indicated it was sent at 1:37 here, which
would be 11:37 there. So I figured he had 23 minutes left. :)
Julia
Do I have to explicitly use the following .sig all the time? Hasn't
it been long enough for it to be just understood?
-- Ronn! :P
Professional Smart-Aleck. Do Not Attempt.
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
