>>>>> Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes: > Hi Arash, >>>>> Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: >>> What way should we take? To partially revert the change discussed in >>> [1]? Or to fix the style file each time similar problem occurs? Or >>> somethig else?
>> Hi Keita, >> I haven't looked at it in depth, but what do you think about this >> solution? > Thanks, it works well. This is categorazed in the second type of the > approaches mentioned above. Does anyone have different opinion that we > should take the first conservative type approach? If not, I agree with > this solution. Since nobody opposed Arash's idea for this week, I think it's accepted. Arash, do you commit it for yourself? Or should I do that? Best, Ikumi Keita _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
