Hi all, >>>>> Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: > Paul Nelson <ultr...@gmail.com> writes: >> Somewhere between when I tried Vangelis's patch (earlier in this >> thread) and when it was installed, it seems that a further change was >> made to preview-region that breaks previews in indirect buffers. >> Specifically, the substitution buffer-file-name -> >> (TeX-buffer-file-name) was applied where it shouldn't be. >> >> The issue is as explained in my earlier email in this thread -- we >> actually want "<none>" to be the filename when doing previews for >> indirect buffers, so that preview-parse-messages ultimately places >> them according to the command buffer rather than according to the >> filename. (It might clarify here to note that AFAIK, the "original" >> argument to TeX-region-create is relevant only when doing >> preview-document, which is irrelevant for indirect buffers.) >> >> I've attached a patch reverting this particular substitution, so that >> previews once again work in indirect buffers.
> @Keita and Vangelis: Any comments on Paul's proposal? Hmm, sorry. Contrary to what I said before, the current master puts the preview images in the base buffer for both document preview (C-c C-p C-d) and region preview (C-c C-p C-r etc.). Maybe I was doing something wrong. :-( It seems to me that Paul's approach makes sense. I'd like to hear Vangelis'es opinion. Best regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
