On 19 May 2016 at 00:04, Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote: >> It is often easier to write expected-to-fail tests this way (so that >> they can all look the same), rather than have to have, for example, an >> extra driver that converts expected errors into success codes for the >> automake test harness. > > What do you mean precisely by “an extra driver”?
This would be a reference to a "custom test driver". https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Overview-of-Custom-Test-Drivers-Support.html#Overview-of-Custom-Test-Drivers-Support
