On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:55:02 -0500 Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't get this; I must be missing something. If I do, in > > bash-3.1: > > I get identical results with fully-patched versions of bash-3.1 and > bash-3.2: $ /data/g2/tmp/portage/app-shells/bash-3.2_p9-r2/image/bin/bash -version GNU bash, version 3.2.9(1)-release (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. $ /data/g2/tmp/portage/app-shells/bash-3.2_p9-r2/image/bin/bash ~/x17 yes 1 yes 2 yes 3 yes 4 That's with bash-3.2 built with only the 001 through 009 patches applied (we have a few other local patches for various reasons, but I've built without them to be sure they're not affecting this). What's the (7) in the release number - does that refer to difference I might be missing? -- Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
