On Thursday 22 May 2008, Brendan Oakley wrote: > With some effort and help, I have Bash 3.1 built and mostly working > under OS/2. This uses gcc 3.3.5 with "kLIBC" 0.6.3, rather than the > old EMX tools. 3.2 needs a bit more work, and some of the patches > might need some more polish. My questions: > > Are you interested in these patches? > > If so, would you prefer I submit them in bits, for each individual > fix, or do you want to see the whole thing in one big patch? > > Will you accept them now even though the effort is not yet complete, > or would you rather I had Bash 3.2 working 100% with perfect style > before you want to see it?
posting patches would probably be useful to the next random person who wants bash running on OS/2, but if you want to get included, writing proper patches against the latest release+patchset is the way to go. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
