https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158
Bug ID: 31158
Summary: ld: Should --gc-sections respect RHS of a symbol
assignment?
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: i at maskray dot me
Target Milestone: ---
cat > a.s <<e
.globl _start; _start: ret
.section .rodata.bar, "a"
.global bar; bar: .quad 0x1122334455667788
e
echo 'x = bar;' > a.t
echo 'PROVIDE(x = bar);' > b.t # not used, but worth testing
as a.s -o a.o
ld.lld --gc-sections a.o a.t -o a.lld
ld.bfd --gc-sections a.o a.t -o a.bfd
ld.gold --gc-sections a.o a.t -o a.gold
In gold and lld, the symbol assignment `x = bar;` retains .rodata.bar while BFD
doesn't:
ld.bfd: removing unused section '.rodata.bar' in file 'a.o'
Perhaps gold and lld's behavior make more sense?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
