Eric Blake <[email protected]> writes: > So I'm in favor of > such a change. But it takes some thought. Would: > > ls - < . > > behave like 'ls .' or 'ls -d .'?
I would say that "ls - < ." should behave like "ls ." and that "ls -d - < ." should behave like "ls -d ." on the grounds of option orthogonality.
