Hi Paul,
Am 31.03.2011 20:54, schrieb Paul Eggert:
On 03/31/2011 11:25 AM, Christian wrote:
and using "0755" is explicit enough, isn't it ?
Unfortunately it's not that simple, as having 0755 mean
something different from 755 would violate the principle
of least surprise. Please see the thread starting at
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-07/msg00124.html>.
I read it and I came to the conclusion
755 should preserve s-bit: OK
2755 sould set sbit. OK
0755 should remove sbit, cause it is explicit wanted.
and not doing so is a "lemming behaviour".
noone considered that perhaps solaris behaves wrong.
Kind Regards
--
Christian
---------------------------------------------------
Der ultimative shop für Sportbekleidung und Zubehör
http://www.sc24.de
---------------------------------------------------
