Follow-up Comment #9, bug #23443 (project findutils):
Jim, can you see any way to work around the fts cycle detection problem
outlined in comment#5? I can't right now, but I thought I'd ask you before
marking the problem as non-fixable.
(it amounts to, is there any evidence we could use to avoid a false positive
in cycle detection for directories that genuinely share the same block device
number and inode number? I can't think of a way which would still be
POSIX-compliant.)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?23443>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
