On 8/25/06, Ian Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD-training to intermediate level (FIBS 1650). Supervised training on rolled-out positions to get to advanced stage (FIBS 1800). Positions included some where gnubg was known to err, and others chosen at random. Supervised training on positions where 0-ply evaluation differed from 2-ply evaluation. Gnubg achieved expert level (FIBS 1930).
How was the last set of position chosen. As a subset of the previous?
Since Gnubg is now over the plateau reached by TD training, I wondered if a new bout of TD training on top of the supervised training might be beneficial. Øystein and Joseph, are you saying that you have already tried this, to no avail?
My guess is that it wouldn't work. As gnubg grew in strength, so did the need to look at the problematic positions. Christian.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
