On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 09:52:08PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Gavin Smith wrote: > > I notice that this script also still supports texi2html, which is no > > longer developed. I could produce a patch to remove this support if > > it was very likely that nobody was relying on it. > > A web search on www.gnu.org shows that the manuals of at least the following > packages still were generated using texi2html: > anubis, auctex, autogen, cfengine, cflow, classpath, combine, complexity, > cpio, freeimpi, freetalk, gama, gnats, gnu-pw-mgr, gnugo, gnuit, gnupod, > hurd, indent, libcdio, libjit, oleo, plotutils, radius, sqltutor, tar. > > That's definitely more than nobody. > > Bruno
OK it doesn't do any harm to keep the texi2html support in. The patch I sent applied for both texi2html and texi2any, although I hadn't tested it with texi2html.
