Hi, \s[-\n(.s] resets the size to the previous value while \s-\n(.s sets it to the smallest possible value, which seems inconsistent:
.ps 9
\s[-\n(.s]\n(.s
.ps 9
\s-\n(.s\n(.s
The behavior of \s-\n(.s is compatible with traditional troff so
I think \s[-\n(.s] should be changed to do the same.
Gunnar
_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
