> However, I believe the nroff wrapper should still honor TYPESETTER
> as it is attempting to be compatible with nroff and that's how nroff
> worked by my reading of the documentation.
You can't assume in general that the devices have the same name. For
example, `37', `450', `lp' are valid (TTY) nroff drivers for AT&T
troff but not for groff.
> Or are you saying that TYPESETTER was part of a specific
> implementation of nroff?
This is the only clean solution IMHO.
> >> Additionally, I wouldn't be upset if groff stopped mapping ASCII
> >> input characters into Unicode.
> >
> > This has been already discussed, and I'll fix that somehow for man
> > pages (but not in general).
>
> Thank you. Will that apply to "nroff -man"?
Yes. The fix will be part of the man macros.
Werner
_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
