> Among other things fixed a while ago,
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256226 reports that
> groff uses the 'trap' builtin with numeric signal names rather than
> named signal names.  POSIX only supports named signal names and '0';
> the other numeric signals are XSI extensions.  There seems no reason
> not to use the portable forms in groff.
> 
> Here's an updated patch.

Applied, thanks.


    Werner


_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff

Reply via email to