Follow-up Comment #3, bug #59442 (project groff):
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> this may indeed be worth considering, but after release, not before.
That time has arrived!
The patch as posted still applies fine (even despite the "verbatim" tags being
malformed, which can sometimes cause problems), but the [comment #0 original
submission] makes clear that the patch is incomplete as-as, pointing out:
> the documentation must then mention this fact in the
> explanation of the "-s" option.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59442>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
