* Yoshinori K Okuji writes: > Thanks for your contribution. I think some of your patch is good, > but I don't like the change on how to boot GNU/Hurd.
> Let me elaborate. Our description on how to boot GNU/Hurd is good > with the latest release of GNU Hurd. I know the latest release is > quite old, and most people are using unreleased versions instead of > it. But it doesn't matter how many people have snapshots - hurd-0.2 > is still the latest, official release, and we need to describe > official versions rather than arbitrary versions downloaded from the > CVS repository at some time. Unless the Hurd maintainers announce > any version number, how can we specify which way the user should > follow to boot GNU/Hurd? Hmm... Point taken.. Maybe this could be made an separate entry noting that this is for the CVS version with some kind of a date attached? Problem is that GNU 0.2 is not supported since a long time and everyone that tries to use it get pointed to the CVS repository anyway. -- Alfred M. Szmidt _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
