On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:21:06PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > Tried to reproduce, but with no substitutes and no grafts. > Wed Oct 18 18:48:34 2023] mes[19410]: segfault at 0 ip 0000000001016085 sp > 00000000ffff5044 error 6 in mes[1000000+18000] likely on CPU 4 (core 8, > socket 0) > [Wed Oct 18 18:48:34 2023] Code: 60 01 01 e8 71 ef ff ff 83 c4 04 85 c0 b8 00 > 00 00 00 89 45 fc b8 00 00 00 00 bb 00 00 00 00 50 89 d8 8b 5d fc 01 d8 89 c3 > 58 <88> 03 85 c0 c9 c3 3a 00 61 73 73 65 72 74 20 66 61 69 6c 3a 20 00 > > Which should be the first, and perhaps only one before conf and tests. > Reported as guix binary requested with caveats that while GNU, i tend to opt > for UNIX crashy. and could be hard to chase with coincidence mixed in; > hard to chase.
took much longer with --no-grafts and --no-substitutes, but this also showed up again, but not the seed. [Thu Oct 19 12:18:54 2023] xsltproc[5943]: segfault at 7fffff7fefe0 ip 00007ffff7b952ce sp 00007fffff7fefb0 error 6 in libc.so.6[7ffff7b2a000+167000] still fairly sure its from guix building. [Tue Oct 17 21:33:19 2023] process 'bootstrap-seeds/POSIX/x86/kaem-optional-seed' started with executable stack